Becoming a Teacher X

The Southeast Iowa Writing Project (SIWP) class started on July 30, 1979. It met each day from 8:00 to 4:00 in the basement of the library at Iowa Wesleyan College. The air-conditioner went out for a few days of the three-week course and we moved to the basement of Henry County Savings Bank until it was repaired. I liked the campus setting much better.

The mornings were devoted to reading research and professional opinions about effective instruction in general and writing specifically. There was a large collection of articles and books to read. We also spent a lot of time talking about our own teaching and discussing the reading material both in large and small groups. It was an incredible learning opportunity. Talking about your professional practice and reading and hearing about that of others was rich experience.

In the afternoons we wrote and shared our own writing. Suddenly, we were all in the position we placed our students in all the time. That was very intimidating! Sharing something as personal as your writing is risk taking. It made many of us all very nervous. Some very brave ones did it right away and that made it harder for everyone concerned because the pieces were very good and I remember thinking that I was way out of my league with this group.

There were rules. We followed a response process that was called PQP. The first P was for Praise. The second letter was for Question and the last for Polish. We were to first tell the writer what we liked about their piece, then ask any questions we had about the piece and last, make any suggestions we might have.

Writers could choose to have their writing only seen by the instructors, shared anonymously or identified in the small or large group. Each afternoon we learned a new way to share and respond to writing using the writing generated by the group. Up to that time most knew of only one way to respond to student writing. Write corrections and suggestions with a red pen on the paper and hand it back.

For most of us this model was revolutionary! We soon realized its power! The response to our writing was always very positive. We were motivated to write a lot more and could see that overtime we were getting better at doing it. The principle was very simple. If you want to be a good writer, write a lot. The teacher’s role was to make that happen with the student. We began to ponder about how this would work in our own classrooms.

By responding positively to student writing the student is motivated to write more. Slowly the writer learns the complex skills of writing. Most of us came from classroom where grammar and punctuation were drilled into students day in and day out and they seldom got to do any writing. With this approach the skill instruction came using the actual student writing. That method, of course, ran contrary to traditionalists and the publishers of textbooks and workbooks.